AgileKocRetroMatik creates focused anonymous rooms for the issues teams avoid, dilute, or cannot say out loud. AI turns answers into team-language insight, voteable topic cards, timeboxed discussion, follow-up actions, and retro memory.
50 credits on signup. One room costs 25 credits. Participants join by link.
Why it exists
They fail because the real signal is politically risky, emotionally loaded, or scattered across remote conversations. RetroMatik protects the person, preserves the signal, and keeps the team focused on the problem.
Participants do not need names or accounts. The facilitator sees the pattern, not who wrote what.
Individual wording is turned into neutral themes, tensions, and topic cards that the team can discuss safely.
Room setup estimates the retro plan by template, question count, and participant count.
Accepted actions and facilitator notes can inform the next room instead of being lost in chat history.
Live facilitator cockpit
Lobby
Done
4 min
3 min
Answers
Done
12 min
10 min
Cards
Done
8 min
7 min
Voting
Done
5 min
4 min
Discussion
Now
24 min
11 min
Closing
Next
7 min
-
Active topic card
The team discusses the highest-priority card while the facilitator keeps private notes.
Visible to team
Accepted action + retro memory
Shared only when the facilitator publishes it.
Answer engine ready
RetroMatik is an AI-supported anonymous retrospective and group reflection room. A facilitator chooses or generates a template, invites participants by link, collects anonymous answers, publishes AI-generated topic cards, lets the group vote, and closes the retro with accepted actions and reusable memory.
Templates
Use built-in system templates or create your own with AI by describing the team problem, current context, and the outcome you want. We show template intent here; the question sets open after signup.
AI-ready template
Surfaces responsibilities that changed after AI tools entered the workflow but were never explicitly redefined. The team examines decision ownership, quality control, perceptions of expertise, and the invisible work created by automation.
Focus
AI kullanımı sonrası rol belirsizliği, karar sahipliği, kalite sorumluluğu ve görünmeyen yeni iş yükü.
Question set opens inside the room
AI-ready template
Reveals the hidden cost of constantly shifting priorities. The team examines not only what changed, but also the abandoned thinking, lost focus, added coordination, and erosion of decision quality caused by repeated redirection.
Focus
Sürekli öncelik değişimi, bağlam değiştirme maliyeti ve ekibin odak kaybı.
Question set opens inside the room
AI-ready template
Surfaces why decisions that appear accepted in meetings fail to translate into real work. The team explores the system signals behind decisions that are not openly challenged but are quietly delayed, reinterpreted, or left unowned.
Focus
Ekipte yapay uyum, sessiz direnç ve toplantıda alınan kararların uygulamada karşılık bulmaması.
Question set opens inside the room
RetroMatik
Surface important signals that the team does not feel able to raise openly in the retro.
Focus
Surface important signals that the team does not feel able to raise openly in the retro.
Question set opens inside the room
How it works
RetroMatik gives the facilitator a clear flow and gives participants only the action they need at each moment.
Pick a system template or describe the team problem and let AI draft a focused question set.
Set participant count and planned duration. The facilitator pays; invitees join by link.
Participants answer the template questions. The facilitator also answers before analysis.
AI creates a neutral synthesis and voteable topic cards from the submitted answers.
The team scores the cards. The facilitator opens one card at a time for live discussion.
AI helps draft actions, the facilitator accepts them, and the closing summary becomes future context.
Use cases
Use it whenever a group needs honest input before a live conversation.
When people edit themselves on calls but will write honestly in a safer room.
When every sprint needs a sharper focus than generic start-stop-continue.
When a group needs to surface friction without turning the meeting into a blame session.
When you want to inspect whether past actions changed anything.
Recurring retros
Accepted actions, team summaries, unresolved topics, and facilitator-only notes can be carried into later retros so the team can inspect whether it is actually improving.
Team summary
Shared closing note everyone can read.
Accepted actions
Concrete follow-up items copied from the retro.
Facilitator memory
Private notes for the next room and unresolved topics.
Access
Create the room with your AgileKoc account, share the invite link, and let participants answer, vote, and read outputs without touching billing.
Room cost
🪙25
AI template draft
🪙5
What credits unlock in RetroMatik
4 RetroMatik rooms
20 AI template drafts
12 RetroMatik rooms
60 AI template drafts
40 RetroMatik rooms
200 AI template drafts
Alternatives, not additive — mix and match however you like.
Product fit
Use RetroHelper when you need a prepared agenda. Use RetroMatik when you need a real room where people answer, vote, discuss, and leave with a tracked outcome.
RetroHelper
Generate a retro agenda, questions, and facilitation plan before the meeting.
RetroMatik
Run the room live: anonymous answers, AI synthesis, voting, discussion, actions, and memory.
FAQ
Clear answers for facilitators, participants, and teams deciding whether anonymous retros fit their context.
No. Scrum retrospectives are the natural first use case, but the room model works for any team, guild, community, or leadership group that needs anonymous reflection before a focused discussion.
No. The facilitator creates the room with credits. Participants join from the invite link and only see the actions relevant to the current step.
Participants do not choose display names. The facilitator is not shown who wrote which answer. AI analysis is based on the submitted content and is presented as team-level synthesis.
AI analysis does not continue with fewer than three submitted participants, including the facilitator. This protects anonymity and keeps the synthesis meaningful.
Yes. Closing summaries, accepted actions, unresolved topics, and facilitator notes can be used as context in later rooms.
Yes. You can describe the team problem and desired outcome, then use AI to generate a focused question set before opening a room.
Choose a template, invite the group, and let the quiet signals become a focused discussion with a concrete follow-up.
Cookie policyCookie notice
We use required cookies to run the site. Optional analytics cookies help us improve.
See privacy policy